Taboo Language in Political Discussions in X (Twitter)

  • Su-Hie TING Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan
  • Amanda Christy Hanis Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan
  • Humaira Raslie Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan
Keywords: X (Twitter), taboo words, politics, Malaysia

Abstract

The study examined the use of taboo language in political discourse on X (Twitter). The objectives of the study are to: (1) identify the Malay and English taboo words used in political discourse on Twitter, and (2) analyze the function of using Malay and English in political discourse on X. The descriptive study involved the collection of posts from X using the search words “politics” from 1 June 2022 to 31 August 2022 and with geotagging for “Malaysia”. A total of 126 tweets containing 202 posts with taboo words were identified. The analysis showed that the most common type of taboo words is insult and slur (59), followed by cursing (50) and epithets (49). There were less words on obscenity (14), vulgarity (13), slang (9), and scatology (8). No taboo words related to profanity and blasphemy were found. For the function of taboo words, the main function is discrediting other people or ideas (108). The X user used taboo words for other functions less frequently, namely, catharsis (46), strong interpersonal identification (39), attention-getting (7), and provoking of violent confrontation (2). A bigger range of taboo words in English was found for vulgarity and scatology but more taboo words in Malay were found for insult and slur, curse words, epithets, obscenity, and slang. The findings indicate respect for religious and ethnic sensitivities through the absence of blasphemy and profanities.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alivi, M. A. (2025). Social media and the impact on political discourse in Malaysia. In D. A. Arao, W. M. Lim, & H. F. Cheong (Eds.), Future of media in Asia: Artificial Intelligence, digital technology and media practice (pp. 155-169). Springer, Cham, Switzerland.

Cavazza, N., & Guidetti, M. (2014). Swearing in political discourse: Why vulgarity works. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(5), 537-547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14537476

Hashmeta. (n.d.). Social media landscape: Malaysia key statistics platforms you need to know https://hashmeta.com/blog/social-media-landscape-malaysia-key-statistics-platforms-you-need-to-know/

Imraq, S. N. N, Aziz, A., & Mohd Noor, M. (2025). Navigating racial slurs: Pragmatic insights from Malaysian political tweets. International Journal of Modern Languages and Applied Linguistics (IJMAL), 9(2), 43-63.

Kemp, S. (2025, February 5). Digital 2025: Global overview report. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-global-overview-report

Ngu, T. (2025, July 10). Social media landscape Malaysia: Key statistics & platforms you need to know. https://hashmeta.com/blog/social-media-landscape-malaysia-key-statistics-platforms-you-need-to-know/

Nguyen, T. (2011). Twitter: A platform for political discourse or social networking. Global Tides, 5(1), 11.

Rahmah, N. A., Arvianti, I., & Muhid, A. (2025). The use of taboo language as political expression on X social media. Philosophica: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya, 8(2), 159-170.

Silberling, A. (2021, September 27). TikTok reached 1 billion monthly active users. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2021/09/27/tiktok-reached-1-billion-monthly-active-users/

Yaqub, U., Chun, S. A., Atluri, V., & Vaidya, J. (2017). Analysis of political discourse on twitter in the context of the 2016 US presidential elections. Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 613–626. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.001

Zamri, N. A. K., Mohamad Nasir, N. A., Hassim, M. N., & Ramli, S. M. (2023). Digital hate speech and othering: The construction of hate speech from Malaysian perspectives. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1), 2229089. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2229089

Zulkifli, M. S., & Bakar, K. A. (2024). Language shaming on YouTube: Linguistic features, themes, and social implications. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 128-144.

Published
2026-05-19
How to Cite
TING, S.-H., Hanis, A., & Raslie, H. (2026). Taboo Language in Political Discussions in X (Twitter). JURNALISTRENDI : JURNAL LINGUISTIK, SASTRA, DAN PENDIDIKAN, 11(2), 333-345. https://doi.org/10.51673/jurnalistrendi.v11i2.2839
Section
Artikel